Ross Jurewitz San Diego Personal Injury Attorney

Standing up for you in the courtroom...
Standing by your side in the community.

Request a free case review
Home Car Accidents Proposition 213

Proposition 213 and San Diego Rental Car Accidents

Victim Injured by a Hit and Run Driver

Proposition 213 is a California law which prohibits people injured in traffic collisions from recovering damages for “pain and suffering”‚ even where the other driver is at fault‚ if the injured driver did not own auto insurance at the time of the accident. The reason for the law is that California wants to encourage drivers from purchasing auto insurance. Essentially‚ the penalty for not having auto insurance is that you cannot recover full damages if you are injured–the injured motorist can only collect damages for economic losses (medical bills‚ loss of earnings‚ etc.) but not “non-economic” damages (e.g.‚ pain and suffering).

hand holding car key

The owner of the rental car would be financially responsible and its’ auto insurance coverage would apply if the renter’s negligent driving caused injury to another motorist.

Does Proposition 213 Prevent A Victim from Recovering Pain and Suffering Damages?

So‚ what happens if (1) a driver who doesn’t have auto insurance‚ (2) rents a rental car‚ (3) elects not to purchase auto insurance from the rental car company‚ and (4) is then injured due to another driver’s negligence?

The answer is: No.

The injured driver can still collect pain and suffering damages‚ even though they personally did not own an auto insurance policy‚ because the rental car company’s auto insurance policy itself will satisfy Proposition 213’s requirements. Under California Vehicle Code Section 16451‚ every owner of a motor vehicle must insure their vehicles under the name of the named insurer “and any other person using any motor vehicle registered to the named insured with the express or implied permission of the named insured.” In the context of a rental car company‚ this would include the renter of the motor vehicle who is voluntarily receiving the rental car in exchange for payment to the rental car company. Proposition 213 would also be satisfied because under California Vehicle Code Section 17150‚ an owner of a motor vehicle is liable for death or injury resulting from the negligent or wrongful act of operating its’ motor vehicle.

In other words‚ because the owner of the rental car would be financially responsible and its’ auto insurance coverage would apply if the renter’s negligent driving caused injury to another motorist‚ Proposition 213 would be satisfied if it were instead the other motorist’s negligence who caused injury to the renter.

  • $300,000

    Rear End San Diego Car Accident Results in SI Joint Fracture.

  • $200,000

    San Diego Car Accident With Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

  • $100,000

    San Diego Car Accident With Low Property Damage and Shoulder Surgery.

See All Case Results

Our No Fee Guarantee®

We promise that our clients will not owe a penny if our team fails to obtain any compensation on their behalf.

Learn More
  • 110% better than anyone else.

    I chose Jurewitz because they were understanding and professional. JLG acknowledged me not just as a client, but also as a human being.

    - Jasmine O.

  • Jurewitz is the only way to go.

    Everyone at Jurewitz Law Group treated me like family. Times were tough but I’m moving on now thanks to them. I can’t even put it into words. I am just so thankful.

    - Arnold V.

Request Your Free Case Review

Let us fight on your behalf. Contact the Jurewitz Law Group to discuss the details of your case. All form submissions are confidentially reviewed by our excellent support staff and are answered within 24 hours.